Tonight I am blogging about two different short stories I read. the first short story is "Words" by Curtis Regan. Although this story was short somehow within the 20 or so pages I was able to connect with the characters. I think because the subject was so serious so sudden the character development happened very quickly allowing the reader to become close to the characters of Andy and Mellisa. At first I did not think that I was going to like the story because lets be realistic here, what teenagers actually address their siblings as "big brother" and "little sister". That to me is so cheesy because real brother and sister do not do that, at least no one I know. But as I got farther along in the story I began to have compassion for the children learning that their mother had died. I wanted to know why Andy was so upset. And I was glad that by the end Andy's perfect reputation wasn't actually so perfect. Because it makes him more relate-able to adolescents. And gives a good message that telling the truth always prevails over living a lie. Although I did like the story, I can see how maybe some cultural differences could make this story hard to identify with. The children come from a wealthy family, where the sons biggest concern was winning and not letting anyone down. The children complain about the apartment they live in because it is on the wrong side of town, even though in the brief description that is given of the apartment it is not small and sounds beautiful. And unlike most children, they wont have the luxury of choosing to either take an inheritance or do what they want to do. But is that such a bad thing? Does every piece of text that is published have to worry about whether or not it can relate to everyone's cultural differences or stereotype? I do not believe so, and for that reason I give this short story an A. Because even though it was based on one specific "stereotype" the message that it ultimately conveys is great.
The second short story I read was by Lisa Rowe Fraustino called "FRESh PAINt". my favorite thing about this short story was how descriptive it was. It was able to paint (see what I did there) a clear picture in my head what each character looked like and what they were doing. I could see the story playing out in my mind like a movie as if I was Susie. The story was heartfelt but I am still unsure of what the message of the story was. Maybe there isn't a message at all, maybe the whole point of the story was simply that, that it was a story. And I am okay with that. I don't need their to be an underlying message in every story I read, most of the time I read to be entertained, not to learn a life lesson. The only position that I could see this text giving to young adults is the curiosity to explore their own family background and get to know their elders. And the mystery of Mamie, Mamie Ellis could pull adolescents into the story. Although now that I think about it, I guess there is a message at the end of the story. How when she returns from college and goes to visit Mamie she has to make the hard decision of doing what is best for Mamie even though she herself will be sacrificing a few brief moments of happiness. Overall I give this story an A as well. Because even though the message was small and at the end the actual concept of being just a story really appealed to me.